I’ll open up by saying I don’t entirely disagree with you. There are many books that have excellent cultural relevance and I would recommend them to people.
My biggest contention with Reading for Pleasure, Reading for Sustenance is the idea that you need to cleanse your palette with a book you should read. Your analogy was how some books are like cookies and others like vegetables.
Now before you begin writing your retort, I do understand that I shouldn’t take it literally. I know you would never draw a hard line in the sand, but for the sake of my point I’m going to continue the analogy.
I think with sustenance you shouldn’t tell people to eat their vegetables, but you should convince them the benefits of eating healthier. I’m sure that’s similar to what you meant! But there are many books that people have told me to read that sucked.
The Great Gatsby was a boring and I felt contained a lot of exposition that yanked me out of it.
Tortilla Flats was just a couple of dudes drinking the worlds supply of red wine.
The Catcher in the Rye is a long, meandering story of a kid and his weekend trip to New York.
This isn’t a rule. Many modern classics are worth a read! I’m particularly fond of Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. However, as you know probably more than me, time and culture change the impact that books start to have. They become harder to read with time and sometimes I feel they lose their classic status.
Having read many of these classics has taught me how to appreciate symbolism and subtext. I can tell you why The Great Gatsby is a book about the American Dream. The Catcher in the Rye is about the fear of growing up. Tortilla Flats taught me that red wine ruins everything. Everything. I probably wouldn’t have liked Bear v. Shark: The Novel as much if I hadn’t read A Brave New World first.
Understanding these nuances in any book makes reading books more interesting. You start to understand what makes good books good and bad books bad. You learn to pick books that you like, and learn why you like reading them.
This new understanding makes me want to read more. You are driven to find more good books. Books that connect with you. Books that entertain you. Reading to attain knowledge, and reading to enjoy yourself. Like you said, many of these books can be the same!
I think people should learn how to sustain themselves with reading. Reading should take you somewhere with a purpose that you choose. Because I’m able to appreciate some of the things in those classics, it helps me understand what I want to read next. I recently finished At Home by Bill Bryson. Its essentially a fucking textbook, but reading old histories made me more curious.
So for me, I wouldn’t often try and convince someone that they should read Dante’s Inferno because it’s better for them than, say, Animorphs. I might try and convince them that the book and others like it might make them appreciate what they read more.
When you begin to appreciate what you are putting into your brain you start making varied choices and search for the things that sustain you the most. Lord of the Rings might secretly teach you that you love poetry, and you go buy a compendium of Emily Dickinson. The Bible might help you understand religious standpoints, so next you read the Qur’an. John Carter of Mars might convince you to read Speaker for the Dead because both of those books are dope as fuck. The Catcher in the Rye might bore you to the point where you never pick up a book again, but thank goodness Barnes and Noble sells board games.
In that case, would it be a bored game?
So to finish up the analogy:
Emily approaches Daniel and says, “Daniel! You’ve had far too many cookies! It is time to for something good for you! Here is this new and strange vegetable that is nutritious.
“But dearest Emily, if it is so good for us, why don’t more chefs cook with this vegetable? Or at least have recipes that incorporate this strange and frightening vegetable more?” Daniel retorts while lowering his monocle.
“It has been at least a year since you’ve ingested anything our elders have deemed healthy!” Emily declares while ironically emptying her stein of beer.
“You make a good point, perhaps instead of eating the bitter roots of their labor, I will go to the market and pick for myself more foodstuffs than simply an enormous pile of cookies that also substitutes as my chair.” says Daniel while he attempts to hide the pizza boxes.
So: I want people to find sustenance in reading and pleasure, instead of feeling like they need to read boring older books to sustain themselves.
And perhaps it’ll stop some of them from going on crazy junk reading binges like the Twilight series. Go read Anne Rice. Or Animorphs.